-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Message reactions draft - 3 refTypes #473
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
d37f98c
to
2a13f98
Compare
2a13f98
to
76da3b6
Compare
Context
Description
There are still things missing, this is a work in progress.
This PR replaces the earlier reactions prototype #445 (now closed). The previous prototype was using a single refType with a more complex reaction payload to determine the behaviour of each reaction.
The current approach uses three different refTypes, one for each desired behaviour:
This has the advantage of having separate summary counts for each refType, and also knowing that everyone who participates with reactions in a given refType is subject to the same rules.
Previously (and what many alternative Chat SDKs do) the client was choosing how to react. The application could offer a default (eg via UI) but someone using the dev console (or another client implementation) could add reactions in any mode they liked and have them counted up incorrectly / unfairly to everyone else. Now if someone attempts to use a different refType (eg to react many times in a one-reaction-per-message setting), their reactions might work in the separate refType but nobody else will see them since they'll be watching another refType altogether. Capabilities might help restrict this further in the future.
Checklist
Testing Instructions (Optional)